Church Alive
Home Faith Statements Project Theology Theological Digest & Outlook The Trinity: An Essential For Faith In Our Time

The Holy Trinity

CONTENTS

The Trinity: An Essential For Faith In Our Time

Edited by Dr. Andrew Stirling
Foreword by Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg

Published in April 2002 by Evangel Publishing House,
2000 Evangel Way,
P.O. Box 189,
NAPPANEE, Indiana 46550
(1-800-253-9315)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreword, vii
Acknowledgements, xi
Contributors, xiii
Introduction (Andrew Stirling), xv

Part I: The Trinity in the Scriptures
1. The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: The Trinity in the Old Testament, John N. Oswalt, 21
2. The New Testament and the Trinity, Allen D. Churchill, 31

Part II: The Trinity in Church History-Two Key Areas
3. The Foundation of the Doctrine of the Trinity: The Early Church, Graham Scott, 101
4. The Trinity in the Nineteenth Century, Kenneth Hamilton, 131

PART III: THE TRINITY QUESTIONED-THE CHALLENGE TODAY
5. The Church Challenged: The Trinity and Modern Culture, Andrew Stirling, 149
6. The Trinity Against the Spirit of Unitarianism, Victor A. Shepherd, 171

PART IV: THE TRINITY AND PRACTICAL ISSUES FOR THE CHURCH
7. Called To Be One: Worshiping the Triune God Together, Edith Humphrey, 189
8. The Trinity and Liturgical Renewal, Daniel Meeter, 207
9. The Doctrine of the Trinity and the Renewal of the Church, David Curry, 233
10. The Trinity As Our Guide: The Centrality of the Trinity in Social Ethics, Donald Faris, 273


To order this 302 page softcover book, see your bookstore, or telephone:

Timothy Eaton Memorial United Church, 416 925-5977 (Price $29 including GST)

Points on the Holy Trinity

Under construction. First draft by Dr. Graham Scott

1. God is infinite. He cannot be defined. He cannot be understood; St Augustine said, "If you can understand it, it's not God." But God can be known in a personal way.

2. The word "Trinity" does not appear in the Bible. It was first used in the Church in 181 A.D. It is short-hand for teaching that is definitely in the Bible, particularly in the New Testament (NT).

3. The key passage is Matthew 28:19. Jesus said, "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit..." Note that the word "name" is singular, for God is one. But God is not a mere monad. God is a loving unity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. In other words God is one in three and three in one. This follows from Matthew 28:19.

4. Similar teaching is found in Paul. See 2 Corinthians 13:14; Romans 1:1-4; Ephesians 2:18.

5. The baptismal narratives show God calling Jesus his Son and the Holy Spirit descending on him visibly. See Matthew 3:13-17; Mark 1:9-11; Luke 3:21-22. And so we discern the Father speaking, the Son receiving and the Spirit descending.

6. John's Gospel develops the doctrine of the Trinity with emphasis on Jesus. In truth the incarnation of the Word of God is what makes the doctrine of the Trinity necessary. See John 1:1-4 and 14-18. Here Word and Son mean the same person. Regarding the Holy Spirit see John 7:37-39; 14:15-17; 15:26; 16:5-15.

7. The Church teaches that God has always been and will always be Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The Son or Word became a human being, not as if he stopped being the eternal Son of God, but by taking up human nature into his divine nature. Jesus is truly God and truly man. Since Jesus is truly God, his sacrifice on the cross is infinitely precious, outweighing all the sins of the world. Since Jesus is truly man, he has lived and died on our behalf and in our place. Since Jesus is God-man, he has conquered death by dying in his human nature and by rising again on the third day.

8. There are some images of the Trinity to help us to accept that God is one in three and three in one. (a) St Patrick used a clover leaf or shamrock to show the oneness and the threeness of God. (b) An equilateral triangle shows that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are one and equal. Remember that the Trinity is undivided and therefore each Person cannot be regarded as one-third of the whole. (c) One's own personal unity of will, memory and intelligence shows that every human being is one in three and three in one. After all, God made us in his own image.

9. St Anselm wrote that he believed so that he might understand. Without faith in the heart of the reader, the Bible does not seem to make a lot of sense. Faith is not only trust in God and Christ but also obedience to God's commandments. Without obedience to the commandments, one cannot really make sense of the Bible. Faith and obedience result in a personal relationship to God and therefore in a prayer life. A personal relationship to God involves a personal relationship to others.

A very readable account of the Trinity is found in Nicky Gumbel's Searching Issues, Chapter 7, pp. 110-142. You can order this book from Beacon in Paris, Ontario, 800-263-2664.

A practical, readable and helpful book is James B. Torrance's Worship, Community & the Triune God of Grace (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity, 1996), pp. 130. Chapters are (1) Worship--Unitarian or Trinitarian? (2) The sole priesthood of Christ, the Mediator of worship; (3) Baptism & the Lord's Supper--the way of communion; (4) Gender, Sexuality & the Trinity.

The Nicene Creed describes the Church's faith in the Trinity. It was honed from early baptismal creeds first in 325 A.D. and expanded in 381 A.D. Here is a 1995 revision of the somewhat inaccurate ICET version:

I believe in one God,
    the Father, the Almighty,
    maker of heaven and earth,
    of all that is, seen and unseen.
And I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ,
    the only-begotten Son of God,
    begotten of the Father before all worlds,
    God from God, Light from Light,
    true God from true God,
    begotten, not made,
    of one Being with the Father;
    through him all things were made.
    For us humans and for our salvation
        he came down from heaven,
        and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary,
        and was made human.
        He was crucified for our sake under Pontius Pilate
        and suffered and was buried.
        And on the third day he rose again
        in accordance with the Scriptures,
        and ascended into heaven
        and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
        And he will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead;
        his kingdom will have no end.
And I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
    who proceeds from the Father,
    who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified,
    who has spoken through the prophets.
    And I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
    I acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
    I look for the resurrection of the dead,
    and the life of the world to come. Amen.

A useful commentary on the creed is the Faith and Order Paper No. 153 entitled Confessing the One Faith: An ecumenical explication of the apostolic faith as it is confessed in the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed (381) (Geneva: WCC Publications, 1991), pp. 139.

Theological students should tackle Thomas C. Oden's The Living God: Systematic Theology: Volume One (Harper San Francisco, 1987), pp. 430, especially chapter 5, but the whole book and indeed all three volumes are of a piece. Oden has absorbed the Fathers, the Reformers and modern theologians, and presents a deliberately unoriginal, ecumenical articulation of the faith with clarity and concern for the student.

Inclusive language issues and feminist concerns are addressed in the collection of essays edited by Alvin F. Kimel, Jr., Speaking the Christian God: The Holy Trinity and the Challenge of Feminism (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992), pp. 337. The essays by Elizabeth Achtemeier and Stephen M. Smith are lay friendly. Feminist Ruth C. Duck reviewed the book in Christian Century, May 19-26, 1993, pp. 553-556.

Prof. Harold Wells in the Winnipeg Touchstone reviewed "God for Us: The Trinity and the Christian Life" by Catherine Mowry LaCugna, in Vol. 11/3; and "She Who Is," by Elizabeth Johnson, in Vol. 13/1.

Dr Victor Shepherd's "Can a Recovery of the Doctrine of the Trinity Assist the Restoration of the United Church of Canada?" appeared in Theological Digest & Outlook, Vol. VIII, No. 1, January 1993, pp. 1-5.

Prof Colin E. Gunton has written The Promise of Trinitarian Theology (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991), pp. 188. See also the two volume Theological Dialogue between Orthodox & Reformed Churches, ed. Thomas F. Torrance (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic, 1985 and 1993); Vol. 2 includes the "Agreed Statement on the Holy Trinity," pp. 219-226, a landmark for ecumenical relations. This statement and Torrance's introduction are printed in TD&O VII/2, July 1992, pp. 13-16.
 

The Gift of the Spirit

by
David L. Fisher
 

Introduction

        Two contemporary trends make a study on the Holy Spirit particularly timely. First, the continued growth of the charismatic movement throughout the world, and second the movement towards interfaith dialogue. While the influence of the former upon the United Church has waned in recent years, two booklets have been published by the Division of Mission dealing with topics directly pertaining to the movement. The Charismatic Movement: Problem or Promise?;1 was published in 1975 and Perpetual Pentecost?2 was published in 1984.  A  third, Where the Spirit is There is Freedom3 published by the United Church Publishing House in the mid-1980’s dealt more broadly with the topic of the Holy Spirit.  With respect to Interfaith dialogue, the United Church has published Mending the World in 1997. Drawing on earlier work, it affirms the belief that God calls the Church “to discern and celebrate God’s Spirit in people of other religions and ideologies.”4
        In attempting to clarify the person and work of the Holy Spirit, this paper shall include the following: a brief description of  what the scriptures say about the Spirit’s person vis-a-vis his work, what it means to understand the Holy Spirit as a gift, as well as listing and distinguishing between the gifts and the fruit of the Holy Spirit.
 

The Holy Spirit Is a Person Who Comes By God’s Initiative

        A brief survey of the scriptures, both Old and New Testaments, reveals the work
of the Holy Spirit in every aspect of the life of God. From creation when the Spirit “[hovered] over the waters” (Genesis 1:2), to redemption whereupon believers are “born of Spirit”  (John 3:5,6) and enter into the family of God (Rom. 8:9,11,15); from the resurrection of Jesus Christ (Rom. 8:11) to the declaration that Jesus is Lord
(1 Cor. 12:3); and ultimately to His being poured out upon “all nations” (Acts 2:17,cf. Joel 2:28), the Holy Spirit is inseparable from God. Indeed, the Holy Spirit is a personal being who can be grieved (Isaiah 63:10, Eph. 4:30), who teaches (John 14:6), who reveals truth (John 16:13), who intercedes on behalf of believers (Rom. 8:27), who guides (Acts 20:22) and appoints leaders (Acts 20:28), who  empowers ministry (Isaiah 11:2; 1 Cor. 2:4),  and is Himself declared to be “Lord”   (2 Cor. 3:17). While a full theology of the Holy Spirit had not been developed by the first century writers, it is clear that the doctrine of the Trinity stands in continuity with their understanding of God.
        The person of the Holy Spirit is a gift to the Bride of Christ, that is theChurch, defining her membership (Mark 9:38-40), and empowering and directing her mission. This does not preclude the Spirit from working outside the Church, but it does, by virtue of the revelatory work of God, equip the Church to discern the Spirit at work in the world. Hence, the apostle John exhorts his readers to “test the spirits” thereby cautioning believers to be wary that what is “spiritual” is not necessarily of the Holy Spirit. He concludes by saying that “every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God and that every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God” (1John 4:1-3a). The task of discernment is done by the Church in recognition that she is the servant of God, not keeper of or master over the Holy Spirit.  Any attempt to manipulate the Spirit as one would make use of an impersonal force, is to be condemned.5

    The Holy Spirit as Gift

           As a gift, the gift of the Holy Spirit , in one sense,  may be likened to the word of God. Spoken through the Old Testament prophets the word empowered, was accepted or rejected, and brought life. In John’s Gospel we see the Word being embodied in Jesus and identified with God (John 1:1ff.). Likewise, the Old Testament records the Holy Spirit empowering a select group of individuals for specific tasks (e.g. Exodus 31:3, Numbers 27:18, Micah 3:8 etc.); of being grieved because of rebellion (Is. 63:10); and of being an agent through which life comes (Genesis 2:7; Psalm 33:6). Within the New Testament we see the Spirit  indwelling the Church, (1 Cor. 3:16), that is, abiding in those who identify for themselves Jesus as their Lord (1 Cor. 12:3).
           Accordingly, the Holy Spirit came upon believers after the resurrection of Jesus (John 7:39).  Jesus himself was empowered by the Spirit, (Luke 4:18-19) and told his disciples to wait until they had been empowered by the same Spirit (Acts 1:4,5). John’s Gospel makes it clear that the Spirit was given at the request of Jesus to his heavenly Father (John 14:16,17) and moreover Luke’s Gospel tells us that the Holy Spirit is given to those who ask the Heavenly Father (Luke 11:12). What does it mean to understand the Holy Spirit as a gift?
         First, gifts can not be earned. The gift of the Holy Spirit (Greek dorea - Acts  2:38,8:20, etc.), is bestowed by God’s own initiative and as such there should be no inherent sense of superiority on the part of those who have received the gift. The Spirit is not intended to be a badge of merit given for moral living. Gifts are gifts, and in this case the gift is God Himself.
        Second, the Holy Spirit comes from the Father and at the bequest of the Son to those who are receptive to him. Hence the New Testament proclaims that the
Holy Spirit dwells in believers (1 Cor. 6:19), creating a new relationship unlike that which exists between God and unbelievers. The gift of the Holy Spirit incorporates the believer into the family of God (Romans 8:15-17, John 17:21f.), creating an intimacy with God as Father and Christ as head.
         Third, the gift of the Holy Spirit is intended to empower the believer for service. Subsequent to the death of Jesus, the apostles had to wait to be empowered by the Holy Spirit whereupon they began to perform miracles not unlike those Jesus had performed during his earthly ministry. By the power of the Holy Spirit the disciples were transformed from a group of fearful and distraught hideaways into the apostles who took the Gospel to the world in spite of intense opposition.  By the power of the Holy Spirit the Church was formed at Pentecost (Acts 2), and by the power of the Holy Spirit it grew until Christianity became the dominant religion within the Roman empire.
        And fourth,  the Holy Spirit as a gift is an eschatalogical sign of God’s working. God promised to pour out His Spirit (Is. 44:3;Ez.39:29, Joel 2:28,29, Zechariah 12:10) a promise that was fulfilled on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-21) marking the dawning of a new age. The gift of the Holy Spirit marks believers as a “seal” of their redemption, a state which paradoxically both is and yet to be (Ephesians 1:13-14.)

The Gifts of the Holy Spirit

         The Greek word used by New Testament writers to describe the “gifts” of the Holy Spirit is charismata  from which we get the term charismatic. It is telling that the root word charis is translated grace. The very nature of spiritual gifts is to point to God the Spirit who gives them. The charismata by definition can not be earned or possessed by human effort, though they may be sought (1 Cor. 12:31). It is my view that as gifts they should not be seen as individual possessions of believers, but rather as graces given not only to the person who exercises the gift, but also to the person or group who benefits from it being used. To give an example: one may be given a word of wisdom as a gift, but that same word of wisdom may be viewed as a gift to all who hear it.  Or, one may be given gifts of healing, and each healing may be seen as a gift  to those who are healed. Clearly spiritual gifts are given to glorify God
(1 Peter 4:10-11) and for the common good of the Church. (1 Cor. 12:7;14:12,26).
        Given their focus, spiritual gifts are reserved exclusively for Christians.6
Morley Clarke distinguishes spiritual gifts from natural talents by saying that “[ ] natural talents are given to all people by virtue of their creation, spiritual gifts are given to those who are the sons and daughters of God through Christ, by virtue of their re-creation.”7
        Scholars are divided as to the number and type of gifts the Holy Spirit gives. In response to the question ‘how many different gifts are there?’ John Stott writes: “[there are] at least twenty are specified in the New Testament, and the living God who
loves variety and is a generous giver may well bestow many, many more  than that.” He goes on to say that, “Paul  makes this point by emphatic repetition as he introduces the subject. In contrast to the one Spirit, he writes, there are varieties of gifts,varieties of service and varieties of working (1 Cor. 12:4-6)”. 8
        There are two key lists of charismata (spiritual gifts) within the New Testament. The first is found in Romans 12, and the second in 1 Corinthians 12.  The first list  includes: prophecy, service, teaching, exhortation, giving, leadership,  and mercy. The second list adds the following: wisdom, words of knowledge, faith, gifts of healings, miracles, discerning of spirits, tongues, and the interpretation of tongues and administration.  To these may be added the gifts of celibacy (1 Cor. 7:7) and by way of inference,  martyrdom, and voluntary poverty (1 Cor. 13: 3), as well as hospitality
(1 Peter 4:9).
       In addition, Ephesians 4:7-8 also speaks of “gifts”.  In this context  a different Greek word, dorea is used. Whereas charismata emphasizes divinely imparted grace that enables believers to serve, dorea  gives prominence to God’s beneficent act of giving.9  A list of offices within the Church appears in verse eleven: some are appointed to be “apostles,  and some as prophets, and some to be evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers.” (compare 1 Cor. 12:28).10
       Although the gifts of the Holy Spirit may be distinguished from the gifts of God generally, insofar as they are given to believers for the purpose of practical ministry, the fact that there is not a single exhaustive list of the gifts implies that it would be arbitrary to restrict to God’s grace to these specific manifestations. A close examination of Church history for instance, suggests there are other clear examples of what might be deemed spiritual gifts. These include the gift of perseverance and endurance,11 of hymn writing,12 and of craftsmanship.13 C. Peter Wagner, associate professor of Church Growth at Fuller theological Seminary and World Mission,  proposes that three other “gifts” should be included on a comprehensive list. These include missionary work, exorcism, and prayerful intercession.14
       Unfortunately, it is beyond the scope of this paper to catalogue the nature of each gift listed.  Interested readers may wish to investigate specific books written on the topic.15  Before turning our attention to Fruit of the Holy Spirit however, I would note the existence of the cessationalist or dispensationalist theologies. These hold that the more extraordinary gifts such as the speaking in tongues, prophecy, and the performing of miracles were restricted to the time of the apostolic Church.
       Charles E. Hummel notes that while Augustine (A.D. 354-430) acknowledged that the gifts of the Spirit could occasionally be seen, he adopted a “temporary use” argument to explain their widespread absence.16 Protestant reformers generally adopted this position. Richard F. Lovelace puts it succinctly:

      The Reformers, harassed on the one side by Romanists who claimed
      that the miracles of the saints guaranteed the truth of their doctrine and
      on the other side by disruptive enthusiasts who claimed to be inspired
      by the Spirit, adopted as a theological convenience the notion that
      extraordinary gifts of the Spirit were attestations of new revelation,
      in the New Testament era.” 17

      In my view the dispensationalist approach is untenable since it lacks strong supporting Biblical exegesis,  and has to contend with ample evidence throughout Church history testifying to the continued operation of the “extraordinary” gifts of the Holy Spirit.18 Nevertheless, this view continues to exercise wide influence particularly in Western Christendom.

The Fruit of the Holy Spirit

  Both from our Reformed and Wesleyan heritage within the United Church we find a far greater emphasis on the justifying and sanctifying work of the Spirit than we do on the gifts of the Holy Spirit.  John Calvin wrote:

      But in order to have a clearer view of this most important subject,
      we must remember that Christ came provided with the Holy Spirit
      after a peculiar manner - namely, that he might separate us from the
      world, and unite us in the hope of an eternal inheritance. Hence the
      Spirit is called the Spirit of sanctification, because he quickens and
      cherishes us, not merely by the general energy which is seen in the
      human race, as well as other animals, but because he is the seed
      and root of heavenly life in us.” 19

Wesley affirmed the justifying and sanctifying work of the Spirit, and added an emphasis on the witness of the Holy Spirit to the believers salvation:

      First, the “sinner is convinced by the Holy Ghost, ‘Christ loved me,
      and gave himself for me.’ Secondly, “Immediately the same Spirit
      bears witness, ‘Thou are pardoned; thou hast redemption in his blood.’
      No man can be justified without knowing it. The immediate fruits of
      justifying faith are peace, joy, love, power over all outward sin and
      power to keep down all inward sin. 20

       Unlike the gifts of the Holy Spirit which are given to believers for the purpose of ministry on specific occasions and vary in type from person to person, the fruit of the Spirit is meant to be a reflection of the character of Jesus Christ within the heart of every believer. In his letter to the Galatians Paul contrasts the work of the flesh, namely sinful actions and attitudes (Gal. 5:19-21), with the fruit of the Spirit. “The fruit of the Spirit” writes Paul, “is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control”  (Gal. 5:22-23). The image of fruit implies that apart from the working of  the Holy Spirit in the believer’s life, a godly character will not be formed (cp. John 15:1-5,8). It further suggests that just as fruit grows and ripens, so too the characteristics of a godly life mature as the believer continues “walking in the Spirit”. Inevitably these qualities should lead beyond personal transformation to include social transformation as the character of Christ comes into contact with the world around it.

Conclusion

        It has been said that the “work of the Holy Spirit is that of applying the ministry and mission of the Son to our hearts.”21  Indeed, I have tried to show that the scriptural presentation of the Holy Spirit is one of a Person whose work is great and varied. The Holy Spirit is not manipulated by human beings, but as a part of the Triune God is given as a free gift to the Church. The Holy Spirit is to be distinguished from the spirits of this world by the connection to and confession of Jesus as Lord. The gifts of the Holy Spirit are given for empowering the ministry of believers for the benefit of the Church working in the world.  Our United Church heritage has emphasised the justifying and sanctifying work of the Spirit, which inevitably should lead to personal and social transformation as the fruit of the Holy Spirit is manifest in and through the Church to the world.
 

      Endnotes

         1 David Lochhead, The Charismatic Movement: Problem or Promise?  (The United Church of Canada, Division of Mission in Canada for the Committee on Christian Faith, 1975).

         2 Bruce Johnson, Perpetual Pentecost?  A Study on the Charismatic Renewal
(The United Church of Canada, Division of Mission in Canada, 1984).

         3Where the Spirit is There is Freedom, ed. by Dean Salter (Toronto, Ontario: CANEC Publishing and Supply House The United Church of Canada, 1985).

         4 Mending the World: An Ecumenical Vision For Healing and Reconciliation, by Robeert F. Smith, chairperson of the InterChurch-Inter-faith committee. 1997, p.4

         5 The story of Simon the Sorcerer (Acts 8:9-25) from which we get the “sin of simony” illustrates this well.

          6 John Stott writes a helpful section on the relation between spiritual gifts and natural talents in his book Baptism and Fullness  pp. 90-94. Therein he differentiates between the two with reference to their objective (the causes they serve and to which they give) and their motive (the incentives which guide them).

         7 Morley Clark, “What are the Spiritual Gifts” in Where the Spirit is There is Freedom, ed. by Dean Salter (Toronto, Ontario: CANEC Publishing and Supply House The United Church of Canada, 1985), p.36

         8John Stott, Baptism and Fullness the Work of the Holy Spirit Today  (Downers Grove:  Illinois, 1964), p.90

         9 _______________, The Discovery Bible (La Babra, California: The Lockman Foundation, 1987), p.533.

         10There is overlap between the charisma of teaching and prophecy, and the office of the teacher and the  prophet. They may be distinguished by the way and degree to which they are exercised in the Church, and the recognition that they may be accorded by the Church.

         11Take for instance the example of Simon Stylites (d.459) who stood for forty-seven years on pillars of increasing height with shackles around his ankles.

         12Charles Wesley for instance wrote over 6,500 hymns. Should this be seen as anything less than a gift from God?

         13 Bezalel filled by the Holy Spirit as a craftsman - Exodus 31:3

         14 C. Peter Wagner, Your Spiritual Gifts Can Help Your Church Grow  (Ventura, California: Regal Books, 1985), pp.57-85.

         15 here are several good books on the topic available to the interested reader including Spiritual Gifts and the Churchby Donald Bridge and David Phypers, and Your Spiritual Gifts Can Help Your Church Growby C. Peter Wagner.

         16Charles E. Hummel, Fire in the Fireplace Charismatic Renewal in the Nineties  (Downers Grove, Illinios: Intervarsity Press, 1993), p. 81

         17Richard F. Lovelace, Dynamics of Spiritual Life: An Evangelical Theology of Renewal (Downers Grove, Illinios: Intervarsity Press, 1979), p. 121

         18The reader may wish to see appendix 2 of Perpetual Pentecostfor examples within Church history of speaking in tongues, and Morton T. Kelsey’s work Psychology, Medicine & Christian Healingfor a thorough historical overview about the gift healing.

         19John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, III, I,1, (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.,1983, Vol. 1, p. 463).

         20As quoted in Thomas C. Oden, John Wesley’s Scriptural Christianity: A Plain Exposition of His Teaching on Christian Doctrine (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994), p.228.

             21 Ibid, p.226.
 

Trinity

A booklet compiled
for communicants’ classes

Ron Wallace
Elm St. United Church
St. Catharines, ON
1st printing: Nov. 12, 1998
2nd printing (rev.): Nov 18, 1999

Introduction

Most many-god religions (polytheism) have a head god, sort of a chair of the board. The religions with which we are most familiar have only one God. Jews give him the personal name, Yahweh (but it is too holy to say; so they call him Lord), and Muslims call him Allah (which just means God). Christians, although claiming to worship one God, talk about a "triune" (three in one) God and speak of Trinity (threeness in unity): Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Several religious groupings have mulled over the idea of Trinity but have given up and decided that there is only the one deity. Some hold that Jesus is just a human being whose reputation became blown out of all proportion (Unitarians). Or else he is just some other form of created being, something like an angel, whom God assigned the task of undoing Adam’s sin (Jehovah’s Witness). Others have gone in the other direction and declared that Father, Christ and Spirit are three different gods (Mormons).

Dismissal of Trinity shows how hard the idea is to understand. In bad moments some Christians, too, wonder if the whole doctrine is nonsense that our ancestors spouted when they had nothing better to do.

Trinity is not merely hard to understand. It is impossible. Still, we can catch glimmerings and can point in the general direction of meaning. That is what the following pages will try to do. We will begin, and merely begin, the explanation. First we will discuss each person in the Trinity and then close with words about Trinity itself. What is before you is hard but not impossible.

It is also important. Trinity is not an option. The United Church is definitely Trinitarian in the doctrine laid down in the Basis of Union and in the various General Council statements over the years. When we follow the traditional confirmation service, the service used pretty well since the United Church came into existence in 1925, the very first question in that service is:

Do you profess your faith in God your heavenly Father, in Jesus Christ your Saviour and Lord, and in the Holy Spirit your Teacher and Guide?

Besides the "your" word repeated three times to show a personal relationship, each part of that question uses a couple of words to describe God, Jesus Christ or Spirit. The descriptions allow people with pretty wide differences to still answer "yes" to the question. All the legitimate differences, though, lie within the bounds of Trinity.

Please do not imagine that all difference is bad, and that we must toe a rigid doctrinal line. There is plenty of flexibility within Trinity. For example, think of yourself as you have grown. How you pictured God when you were five years old is not how you understand him now. Moreover, what you learn of God in 20 or 50 years will cause you to think of him in still different ways. We grow in our relation to God just as we do in how we know and relate to our parents. Sure, we have bad moments, but when love is there the direction is upwards.

This booklet intends to help organize our present thinking about God and maybe point to places where we could grow.

God the Father

We begin with thoughts about God the Father. Please re-member two things, though, as we go along. First, Christians very much think of him with one eye on Jesus’ teachings. Also remember that we cannot disconnect him from the other persons of the Trinity. Other than that, how we see the Father is not that different from a Jew’s thoughts about the Lord or a Muslim’s about Allah.

Imagining God

The introduction on the previous page hinted that maturity affects how we think of God. Not that immaturity is always second class. The book, Mr. God, This Is Anna, by Fynn, is a true, heart-warming story about a little girl’s contact with God. It shows why Jesus said it is better to come to God as a child does. Becoming an adult can mean growing away from God. It is not necessarily so, but it can happen.

Besides our level of maturity, there are other reasons why different people contact God in different ways. Some folk are task-oriented (wanting to get things done). Others are people-oriented (how they relate to others is more important for them). Some are conscious of colour and form. Others respond by words and their beauty. Still others have not an artistic bone in their body. All these things affect how we like to think of God, and God doesn’t care so much how we think of him -- as long as we continue growing in faith and understanding.

In order to see for ourselves where we are in our understanding of God and where, maybe, we need to grow, it is good to look at different ways of picturing God. The following are 15 ways (taken from Forsyth’s The Christian Life, p. 4), but which five describe how you think of God? Discussing our favourites may show interesting differences among us or maybe will show us ways we had not thought of picturing God. This is not a test where a teacher marks us right or wrong, but rather a method of seeing what kind of picture of God we have. Do you think of God as --

a) a being who makes himself known in three persons: Father,

Son, and Holy Spirit?

b) a being who is working with us to make the world better?

c) a being who is everywhere, knows everything, and can do all things?

d) a big man in the sky with a crown on his head?

e) an idea in our minds?

f) a being who works in and through all and yet is more than all?

g) love?

h) law in the universe?

i) one who, in his goodness, gives his children food, clothing and shelter?

j) one who can set aside the laws of nature?

k) one who can make us do what we don’t want to do?

l) one who writes down in a book everything we do?

m) the creator of all things?

n) our heavenly father?

o) the one who gave the Ten Commandments?

Are some of the above ways of thinking about God "your" ways? If so, it means that already, somehow, God has persuaded you to think about him.

Nudges

How can God put ideas or urges in my head when I don’t speak Hebrew (or whatever God talks)? The technical name for the methods God uses to "nudge" us is means of grace. "Means" is just fancy talk for methods. "Grace" is when God gives a message even though we have not earned it and perhaps do not deserve it. The nudges come not because we are good but because God loves us.

God can nudge us in all kinds of ways. Because we are all different, some methods may work on us better than others. Below is an alphabetical list of some of the more important means of grace. Try ranking (best methods to worst) how they affect you. Then by talking among ourselves we may learn a little more about ourselves and God. As with the last list, remember that this is not a test. It is a way of growing and understanding ourselves. Some people have natural gifts or interests in some things but not in others.

a) the Bible

b) conscience

c) the fellowship of the church

d) history and providence

e) Jesus Christ

f) nature and its laws

g) people

h) prayer

The Sense of God

God does not usually talk to people in English (or Hebrew, for that matter). Still, people do somehow become aware of his presence or messages. Paul on the road to Damascus had a religious experience. He became aware of a presence and asked, "Who are you, Lord?" Did the answer come in Hebrew, Greek or Latin (Paul spoke all three)? We don’t know, but anyway that is not the point. The sense of somebody there shows we can have awarenesses beyond words. That the others present on that occasion heard nothing shows that God’s messages are private -- and may be open to some (right or wrong) interpretation.

Martin Buber, during the First World War, wrote a book on how people experience God. He wanted to describe God’s nudges as basically as possible. How people interpret these messages could be confusing, he found, but deep down there seemed to be sensations or feelings in common. He decided that there are two in all. One is mystery (or wonder), and the other is fascination.

To really meet God is fascinating. If we could decide where he was going to be, people would flock to see him. Unfortunately, when we try searching on our own, usually all we find are substitutes. Then we become discouraged and stop looking. After one good glimpse, though, we become fascinated all over again.

The other feeling, mystery, is a little like fear. A strong case of it makes the hair on your neck stand up; so you want to back off. Moses (Exodus 3:3) becomes attracted (fascinated) by a bush that flames yet does not burn up. Then, two verses later, he realizes God

is there, and his back hairs stand up. He wants to run away. On the other hand, he knows the occasion is special; so he wants to stay.

The combination of attraction and repulsion, both coming at the same time, is a most peculiar feeling. You want to flee and hug at the same time. Nevertheless, it is not English that is coming at us, and because we do not decode God-talk very well, sometimes we misunderstand the message badly.

Misunderstandings

The first misunderstanding is fear. We think that God is "after me." Maybe we interpret the message that way because we are too conscious of the mystery and feel too little of the attraction. Of course, God is after us, but with the aim of reconciliation, not punishment. That is the whole point of Jesus Christ. What we need to do is to admit the awe while overcoming the fear.

The second mistake is to find the attraction too much and want to own God for ourselves. "Mine" is a very powerful wish, and many people regard God as a prized commodity. We cannot, however, own God or use him for our own purposes -- or against competitors. Kneeling down and crossing oneself on the football field is all very well as long as we realize God is for the other side too.

The third mistake is to attach the appearance or message to a place or object (idolatry) rather than to the God who came or spoke. Few people today worship sticks and stones, but many do worship ideas. Or celebrities. To give to a thing or created person the worship that belongs to God is a mistake he commented on in the Ten Commandments. He does not like it.

Another less common mistake these days is to think that each message comes from a different god. Christians are firm in the belief that within Trinity there is no disagreement. Jesus said, "I and my Father are one" (John 10:30). A single plan has their absolute agreement and governs all that God wills to happen.

Main Attributes

What do we really know about God? The catechism answers the question "Who is God?" this way:

God is the almighty Father who made and controls all things according to his holy, wise and good purposes.

If God is almighty, I cannot control or own him, as we just saw. If anything, it will be the other way around. Detecting his holiness, his complete "otherness," is what gives me the shivers. His wisdom means he is properly in charge and has put together in a good manner what he has planned and created. His goodness gives me hope even though I feel like nothing before him. The Psalmist (103:13) declares:

As a father pities his children,

so the Lord pities those who fear him.

Jesus seized on that word father and made it so central to his own understanding of God that we now capitalize it (Father) to show it is a fact, not just an analogy. It has become the new name of God.

As mentioned in the introduction, the old name for God was Yahweh. That was his personal name given to Moses at the burning bush, but far too holy to say. They would call God "Lord" instead. To remind them not to say it out loud, whenever they wrote God’s name they used the consonants for Yahweh and the vowels for Lord. It came out looking like "Jehovah" -- a made-up word that nobody said.

Then along came Jesus calling God "daddy." It was startling for everybody and seemed downright disrespectful to many. That was one reason why Jesus got into trouble.

There are many other ways of thinking of God. A common one is Creator or Maker (as in the Apostle’s Creed). Sustainer has become popular, because it tells us that God did not simply create and then walk away. He upholds his creation constantly. As the song says, "He’s got the whole world in his hands."

God the Son

We can sum up the heart of Christianity by quoting John 3:17 -- "God sent his Son into the world not to condemn the world but that the world, through him, might be saved." The Son referred to is Jesus.

The Gospels also call Jesus the Christ (Luke 9:20 and Mark 14:61; it is a title, not a last name) or Messiah (John 1:41). These two titles are Greek and Hebrew words. Both mean "the Anointed One." They say that Jesus is the fulfilment of all Old Testament prophets, priests and kings (who were also anointed).

One more title for Jesus is "the Second Adam" (I Corinthians 15 21-22,45; adam is the Hebrew word for "a man"). Early believers saw his perfect life as undoing Adam’s sin. His unjust death became total payment on behalf of all who attach themselves to Jesus.

What are these titles saying? They say that Christianity firmly believes two things. (1) God is the ultimate power in heaven and on earth. (2) He has chosen to carry out his final plans by sharing his authority with Jesus of Galilee who is now the risen Christ.

God/Christ’s Authority

Human nature, being what it is, does not want to give God or God-in-Christ total control. We want a say at the very least. If possible, we want total say of how things are run here on earth. This is not a modern disease. It has always been there.

When Christianity was still young, some people thought they knew of a way to gag God and take over. They said there were secret ideas that had power over life and death (and, in effect, over God). If you knew the secret, your present and future were assured. For them, "true Christianity" was that knowledge (the Greek word being gnosis); so people called them Gnostics to distinguish them from regular Christians. Ordinary Christians believe that God is the final authority, not some magic word or idea.

Another example of displacing God happened in the 18th century. There was a religion called Deism. It said, "Sure there is a God, and yes he created the universe. But he made it like a clock maker. He put it together, wound it up to get it going, and then went away to do something else." God, by this view, is so absent that he has no effect.

That way of thinking did leave human beings free to run their own lives -- which was what those people really wanted. Occasionally, as with any unlimited freedom, it was "While the cat’s away the mice play." More often, though, people lived responsible lives and tried to be moral, benevolent, etc. Some even tried to fix the world so that God, on his return (or on our departure to God), would approve of what they had accomplished.

Obviously Deism and Gnosticism are not dead today. Many still try to "do" and to "know" their way into heaven or into God’s approval. Nevertheless, official Christian doctrine has always denied that the centre of faith is some sort of technique or work plan. It is not, centrally, what you do or what you know that counts. It is whom you know.

A Biography of Jesus?

The "who" has to do with a Jewish carpenter who lived in Palestine about two thousand years ago. His name is Jesus, and fastening the faith to this person makes Christianity very much an historical religion.

Yet, concerning Jesus’ life, really, we know very little. This seems strange for a person who has been, since the start of the faith till now, the central concern of more than a billion people.

There are hints of questionable paternity, and we cannot be sure of his date of birth (about 4 B.C.). His family raised him in a town called Nazareth. He trained as a carpenter and had no higher education. He wrote nothing (except some words in the sand), and never joined the army.

Apparently he left home and occupation to younger brothers and took off with nothing but the robe on his back. A dedicated evangelist named John baptized him, but we have no certificate to prove it.

Then he spent somewhere between twelve and thirty-six months with a small group of students. He gathered them, taught them (and the crowds) and pursued a healing ministry. This took place largely in the rural province called Galilee.

Local leaders became hostile. Roman overlords began to grow suspicious. Together they crucified him by the garbage dump on the outskirts of Jerusalem. Jesus was still in his early thirties.

Although we know very little, we know that the short months of his ministry had been enough to convince his closest students that he was God. All those students were Jews -- who believed in the oneness of God and that there are no other gods before God. For such people to even think of a walking, talking human a divine was revolutionary. It seems, though, that they came to this conclusion not because of what he claimed but because of what they saw in him. We can describe what they saw in three parts.

His Deeds

Records by early Christians (the Gospels) describe many miracles by Jesus. They portray him as curing blindness, deafness, lameness, leprosy and, on one or more occasions, death.

Still, these are not the deeds that convinced his followers. He did not perform miracles with a backdrop of brass band and strobe lights and the message, "I am God." It was quite the opposite. He preferred to do his healing deeds quietly and apart from the public spotlight -- and as demonstrations of faith. His message, according to followers, was never "This proves me divine." Rather, he seemed to say, "This you or anyone with faith can do."

Miracles leave cold our skeptical age; so it is just as well Jesus never put his emphasis on such deeds. Please remember, though, that even his harshest critics never questioned the reality of his cures. They wondered instead whether the power came from God or Satan.

If miracles were not the heart of Jesus’ deeds, what was? Peter, one of Jesus’ students, once tried to sum up what Jesus did. He said his teacher "went everywhere doing good" (Acts 10:38).

"Everywhere" did not mean physical distance, because Jesus never travelled more than about 120 kilometres from his home. He did associate, though, with all types of people -- from the dregs to the best. He healed and counselled everyone who asked without demanding payment.

He seemed so single-mindedly good and so effective that those who were closest to him could not explain him as a mere mortal. Despite their upbringing in firm monotheism, they began to wonder what God, who is pure goodness, would look like if he appeared in human form. Seeing Jesus in operation, they became more and more sure of the answer. After months together, Peter put it in words: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God."

His Words

What Jesus said helped convince his closest associates of his divinity. His words were simple but tremendously pithy. They were always on target of what needed saying.

Yet those words, at first glance, seemed to go far overboard. He joked about criticizing others for having sawdust in their eye when you have a two-by-four in your own. How can you see to remove the sawdust? When one thought about his words, there was something deeply serious underneath.

He spoke of cutting off your hand if it hurt your relation with God. People heard and wondered whether to take this seriously, and then decided they should. A group of soldiers sent to arrest him went back empty-handed. They had made the mistake of

listening before arresting, and their excuse for failure was: "Nobody has ever talked like this person!" (John 7:46).

Most of us have grown so familiar with Jesus’ sayings that they pass through our ears without entering the mind. For all his practicality, his sayings are often the exact reverse of normal thinking. Who would build a lifestyle on loving enemies and blessing those who mistreat them? How many make it a practice not to resist evil?

Jesus seems, at first glance, to be vastly overstating his case -- which is a common form of Middle East humour. Then when one burrows underneath to his reasons for saying what he does, we begin to suspect he is in deadly earnest under the humorous tone.

Whatever he said centred on God’s overwhelming love for all people. He wanted all people to receive that love and then pass it on to others. If that is the way God is, if that is how we are and what people need, then maybe extremes are how we need to act. If God has given and will continue to give full measure and then heaped up some more, we do not need to stop to calculate whether we can afford to give to others. We are to act like God, to "be perfect -- just as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Matthew 5:48).

His Nature

What Jesus did and said would not have been enough to force on his closest associates that he was divine. There was also the fact of what he was.

With most people, it is safest to do as they say rather than as they do. That was not the case with Jesus. He did not merely speak humility and self-giving love. He lived what he taught. More than his words and deeds, the nature of Jesus was the most impressive thing about him.

One day a young man came up to Jesus wanting a pat on the back for the way he had kept the Law of Moses. Instead of complimenting him, Jesus told him he lacked "one thing." The young man

was to go, sell what he had, give to the poor, and then come and follow Jesus.

There are five verbs in the instructions. It seems a little difficult to place the "one thing" the young man lacked, but surely it was single-mindedness. He had not given himself completely to anything. Concern for his riches was coming between him and the Law of Moses. Jesus was asking a single-minded dedication to God without any other thought or care beyond that.

That was exactly how Jesus lived: total concentration on God and what God would want. When he required this of others, he did not do so as a wet blanket out to spoil all fun. The way he saw it, this was the only way that life was enjoyable. People, seeing him in action, believed it and wanted his kind of enjoyment.

Nor did he demand from others recognition of his special relationship with God. Unless they accused him of being in league with the devil, he did not even seem to care what people thought of him. He was, in fact, so self-effacing that we cannot know for sure what he thought of himself. Rather than what people thought of him, he wanted them to think well of God and to want what God wanted of their lives.

With this kind of example before them, it seemed to his closest associates that he was living a life so completely under the will of God that he had disappeared. Looking at him, they felt they were seeing how God would be if he took on human form. One of the Gospel writers (probably not a disciple) put it this way: The Word became a human being and, full of grace and truth, lived among us. We saw his glory, the glory which he received as the Father’s only Son.

His Power

The authorities crucified Jesus after this very short ministry. The death of Jesus had seemed an indication that pure goodness loses in the end. Why try to be good if you end up dangling from a cross?

That, however, was not the end. A few weeks later his students were preaching the gospel of the Risen Lord. His early followers believed, quite literally, that God had restored his body to life.

To an outsider of the time, that proved nothing. Maybe he had only seemed dead and revived, or maybe somebody had used magic. Others had believed in someone’s resurrection on rare occasion. So this resurrection, even if genuine, was no guarantee of uniqueness. There was, however, something different going on here.

To insiders, the resurrection adds absolute power into the mix. In or through Jesus, we have not just goodness but power. Goodness did not die tragically but conquered even that biggest enemy, death. The worst that people could do -- assassinating his life and reputation -- had failed utterly. Even natural laws had given way to this power.

Gospel

Gospel means "good news," but this about power having the last word was the ultimate good news. Enemies and natural law could not hold Jesus down, and we can have a piece of the action.

Christianity spread from an upper room in Jerusalem with such vigour that within weeks it was in a dozen countries. Before the death of the last of Jesus’ students it was in every major city of the eastern Mediterranean and elsewhere as well. How could this happen?

Try to walk in the shoes of someone hearing about Jesus from one of his former students, or from someone who had the news from them. What you see is a life transformed. This was even more true when you saw several of them together. These people lived love for each other. Even slaves and slave masters seemed utterly devoted to each other and spoke as equals!

There was also joy, and outsiders found this more than unusual. These Christians were suffering persecution because of their

faith, but they still radiated peace and joy. They went to their doom praying for each other (hard, surely) but also for their persecutors! No wonder people asked what they had that the average person did not have.

Well, what did they have? They had had burdens removed from their backs. First, they no longer had to fear death because they knew God would remedy death for them. They were utterly sure that the Jesus whom God had raised had taken them into himself and would share with them his own eternal life. This was not some vague philosophy with them. It was a deep-down belief that had turned upside down their whole viewpoint about life and death.

Second, they had had removed from their shoulders the burden of guilt. The best people of the day, both Jew and non-Jew, crept around fearing to offend accidentally some angry god and incur punishment. Not-so-good people felt they were already undergoing punishment; so what is the use?

If God is love, though, his last word is no more punishment than it is for a good and caring parent. If that love is proven to exist, and proven to be more powerful than nature or demon, and proven able to be mine, then I can repent and be accepted. Really and truly God’s. Unconditionally.

Third, believers had had removed from their shoulders the near necessity of selfishness. A God who assuredly loves me (and not merely in principle but personally), a God who is rich and powerful beyond measure, and one who gives without counting, will look after me and mine. So I do not have to be defensive and always protecting myself. I can think of your needs and truly share.

All of these beliefs found focus in the person of Jesus, the Christ. They were not ideas. They were personal experiences. People gave their lives to him with the words, "Jesus is Lord."

It has been so ever since. Christianity, then, is not a set of ideas, not even a set of beliefs. It is contact with a person, it is experiencing his ultimate love, and it is giving life over to him.

Further Titles

Earlier we mentioned Jesus being called Christ, Messiah, Son, and second Adam -- all titles. The New Testament describes Jesus many other ways, all of them having rich and deep connections with Old Testament thinking. Sometimes (e.g., Emmanuel) the Jews described the Messiah using a certain word, and for Christians to apply the title to Jesus makes certain statements about him. Sometimes -- and more daringly -- God was so described in the Old Testament (e.g., Shepherd, King). To apply such a title to Jesus is a huge claim.

Here is a partial list of titles and passages if you wish to look them up. Consider what they are attempting to say about him.

Alpha and Omega Rev. 1:8 Lord of All Acts 10:36

Bread of life John 6:48 Master Matt. 19:16

Emmanuel Matt. 1:23 & 23:8

High Priest Heb. 4:14 Rabbi John 1:49

Judge Acts 10:42 Shepherd Mark 14:27

King Matt. 21:5 Son of David Matt. 9:27

King of the Jews Matt. 27:37 Son of God Mark 1:11

Lamb of God John 1:29 & Son of Man Matt. 11:19

Heb. 4:14 Teacher John 3:2

Light of the World John 8:12 The True Vine John 15:1

The Way John 14:6 The Word John 1:1

God the Holy Spirit

The United Church’s "New Creed" (see Service Book #476) says about the Holy Spirit: "We believe in God ... who works in us and others by his Spirit." That short statement raises a few questions.

Superstition?

Has this talk of a spirit something to do with vague forms wearing bedsheets and going bump in the night? It sounds that way, and does so even more if we recall the older term for the third person of the Trinity: Holy Ghost.

This Holy Spirit, however, has to do with God. He is neither a superstition nor a lost soul unable to find his way into the afterlife. The words refer to the third person of the Trinity, and the reason so many people become confused by the Holy Spirit is that he never has had (or been credited with) a body.

Jesus once strode the dusty roads of Palestine at the head of a group of disciples. So although we don’t really know what he looked like, we can still picture him in a body.

As for the Father, most of us at some time in the past have pictured him as a child would. Maybe we still see him as a stern man with a long beard sitting on a gold throne of judgment and scowling.

What image have we of the Spirit? The best most of us can imagine is a swirl of wind-blown leaves. Our not-so-best image is a ghost.

The problem is our senses. There are many forces in nature that we cannot directly view. Magnetism is one, gravity another. All we can visualize is the results of these forces: the swinging compass needle or the apple falling on Newton. The Holy Spirit is just like that: the force of God, God in action -- except he is not just a force but a person.

Look at the very first question asked of people who are joining the church. It presupposes the Holy Spirit as God "teaching and guiding" us. So the means of grace that we talked about in an earlier section (all that we know about God and his wishes) come to us through the Holy Spirit.

A Personal Force

Magnetism and gravity are modern discoveries. The comparison most used in the Bible is wind or breath. Ruach is the Hebrew word for spirit, but it is also the word for breath or wind. An old movie asks, "Who has seen the wind?" The Holy Spirit is like the wind in that he is invisible and most times we don’t notice him. As for breath, in Genesis God made Adam and then breathed into him the breath (or spirit) of life. Ever since, God’s Spirit has been seen as giving life, whether new life or meaning of life. Jesus’ conversation with Nicodemus in John 3 is an example.

The Spirit often sneaks up on us. Elijah, after fleeing Queen Jezebel, found a new home in a cave and decided his usefulness was over. Then there was an earthquake, storm and all kinds of turmoil. Elijah may have thought to himself, "Is God trying to tell me something?" He detected no message, though, and no Spirit in the tumult. It was in the stillness after that the message came.

Occasionally, though, the Spirit arrives with commotion. That is what happened on the first Pentecost (50 week days after Easter). According to Acts 2, there were tongues of fire, the building shook, and people began to speak strange language. It should have been confusing (it was to those out in the street), but those who experienced the Spirit’s arrival found it invigorating and life-changing.

Speaking of turmoil, one day lightning hit the golfer, Lee Trevino, out on the course. Bob Hope said to him afterwards, "When God wants to play through you better let him!" Whether quiet or noisy, the Spirit often has his way.

When and Where Does the Spirit Work?

Let’s deal with the "when" first. On the very first page of the Bible the Spirit of God "walked on the face of the waters." So he was present at creation and on almost every page after that. Whenever anything good happens -- or when bad happens and people need comforting -- the Holy Spirit is there.

As for whom the Spirit visits, that he is always at work implies he is there for everyone. The Holy Spirit is not reserved for a favoured few. He is present in the lives of every single person who will let him in. Thus our statement of faith about the Holy Spirit being "our teacher and guide" is true when the "our" means everybody and not just Christians.

Still, he does have a special work to do with the church. Because Christ cares especially for his own people, the Spirit is particularly close to the church. Further, the Spirit helps us to hear what scriptures are saying. So when we turn to them for understanding, it is in fact the assistance of the Spirit we are seeking.

His presence is not always welcome, though, because sometimes the message he brings is that we have not done well. Or that we have half done and God wants more. Even here, though, his patience shows God’s confidence in me.

Like with the wind, perhaps the best way to think of the Holy Spirit is to consider the effects. So let us examine the gifts he brings. When we try to define the work of the Spirit, people usually list four kinds of jobs, but there are many more. Let’s look at the four first.

Knowledge

First, the Holy Spirit makes truths clear. He is mainly connected with spiritual knowledge, and whenever faith grows and blossoms, the Spirit is there. When you think about it, though, most knowledge has spiritual uses; so he is also there with secular discoverers.

This is not to say that Christians are always right. Still, when we check facts against what the Bible, church and Spirit are telling us, we usually have an advantage. To these three "boosts" to understanding, you might want to add personal spiritual experience. One of the ways we grow in the natural world is by experience. For example, I learn which plants in my garden are most likely to become buggy and then I check them more often. The Spirit helps me to God-knowledge in the same way. I grow through spiritual experiences.

Come to think of it, is it possible that I am like a high risk plant that the Spirit has to check more often than normal?

Enthusiasm

Second, the Spirit brings enthusiasm. At Pentecost the crowd outside thought for a while that the disciples were drunk. That is how alive they were.

A lack of zeal actually worries God. There is a letter in the last book in the Bible that is addressed to seven churches, one being described as luke-warm. The church is told, "I will spit you out of my mouth." In fact, whenever a life contains resentment and unwarranted pessimism, chances are that that life is already "out of the mouth" and there is desperate need that life turn around.

Whenever the Holy Spirit operates in a life, there will be joy, trust, openness and enthusiasm. There will be all the "fruits of the Spirit" described in Galatians 5:22-23. Through the Spirit we grow in backbone and maturity -- and enjoy life while doing so.

Another aspect of the Spirit’s work is getting us off our behinds and doing. Interestingly, the liturgical colour of Pentecost (the season of the Holy Spirit) is red. That happens to be also the colour of revolution. Just as God is not standing around inactive, so his goal for the world demands it keep going in the direction it needs to go. If we stand still, either in our personal spiritual development or in relation to serving God’s purpose in the world, then we have missed the boat and are not on God’s side.

Comfort

Third, the Holy Spirit grants comfort. Please do not think, though, that religion is a crutch. God is with us through thick and thin. Usually it is in thin times we most notice the Spirit’s presence, because then we have no other support.

Nevertheless, he is always here. That is why it is important to notice the second half, as well as the first, of John 14:17: "I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever, even the Spirit."

Here is something else to think about. The opposite of comfort is an angry spirit. Quite often the reason we are angry and attack others is because we don’t realize how very much God loves us and that he is abiding with us always. If more people knew of God’s love, there might be less need for comfort.

Alice Lee Humphres, in her book Angels in Pinafores, tells about one of her first grade pupils coming to school one cold winter day wearing a beautiful white angora beret and muff. A mischievous boy grabbed the muff and threw it in the mud. The teacher disciplined the boy, then turned to comfort the girl. Brushing mud off the soiled muff, the little girl looked up at the teacher and said, "Sometime I must take a day off and tell him about God."

As far as the girl was concerned, everything that was wrong with the boy could be made right if she could just tell him about God. Was she wrong? Part of our comfort will happen only if we share that comfort with others.

Because he brings comfort the Bible sometimes calls him the Comforter. Because he stands beside us in trouble, we also call him Paraclete (it means he is my "advocate" -- or lawyer in a court case). As Paul said, "If God is for me, who can be against me?" It is through the Spirit that we realize God’s power is present with me. He is the personal, present power of God in my life and in all the world.

Fellowship

Fourth, the Spirit provides fellowship, particularly within the church. It is through the work of the Spirit that the church started in the first place (Acts 2 and everything after). Christians were not to be loose cells moving about at random but the "Body of Christ," individuals working together for the health of the body and under the direction of Christ, the "head."

It was through this fellowship or body that Christians stood up to the power of the Roman Empire and produced uncounted miracles of faith. So it is through the Spirit, and especially through the gift of fellowship, that power comes. We need the discipline, action and encouragement of fellow believers or our belief will lose momentum and our power fail.

God’s contact with his world is through the Spirit, as we will see in our discussion of Trinity.

Trinity

Our whole "natural" existence is complicated enough, but when we throw in the "spiritual realm," it gets even worse. Our God is one, but he is three. What can this mean?

It sounds very complicated. Furthermore, we are assured that "No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him" (Matt. 11:27, John 1:18, 17:25-26). In other words, it seems, we not only don’t understand simple explanations very well but we don’t have a single clue of what’s really going on.

Suitcase Problems

John Stott in a book called Your Confirmation says this:

Trinity is the biggest mystery of the Christian religion. This doctrine is far beyond the grasp of our finite minds.

God-talk is like trying to pack a small suitcase with all our worldly possessions. A little will fit and, if we really work at it, we can usually squeeze in a little more. In the end, though, to get everything about God into our tiny minds is beyond us.

This should not be too surprising. We have to admit that if God is really

-all-knowing while we are not,

-all-powerful while we are limited, and

-everywhere while we are in one place at any point in time,

then our little human minds simply can’t understand God.

This limitation may be one reason why the Jews have always frowned on pictures of God ("graven images" forbidden in the Ten Commandments). Any attempt to draw, paint or sculpt him falls short and ends up creating a mockery. He is also bigger than our symbols can grasp and bigger even than our language can handle.

Bigger than language? How can that be? Consider the way we humans think. Our minds are constructed to place everything in

terms of time, space and cause. God, however, is beyond these categories. If we refuse to admit that, then we have to place God "up there" for Yuri Gagarin to run into with his rocket ship.

Okay, he is beyond even our language ability and symbol scope, but what "little bit" about Trinity can we get into our suitcase? There are a few things.

Not Theology But Experience.

Our natural suspicion is that religious leaders made up the whole Trinity bit. That way, we would need religious leaders to explain things. Stott (who, unfortunately for my argument, is a religious leader) denies that:

Trinity is not a peculiar theory invented by impractical theologians. Rather, it is an attempt to put into words a truth which God revealed in facts of history. The apostles were Jews who had been brought up to believe in God, the Creator of the world and the Holy One of Israel. Then they met Jesus, and as they lived with him, they came to realize that he was no mere man. He was divine. Yet he was not himself the Father, for he used to pray to the Father.

Then he started telling them that someone else, whom he called "the Spirit of Truth" and "the Paraclete" or "Comforter," would come and take his place when Jesus had gone. On the day of Pentecost, the Holy Spirit did come with the fullness of divine power. But he was not the Father. Nor was he Jesus. He was one with them, and yet he was distinct from them. So it was the pressure of their own experience which forced the apostles to believe in the Trinity.

Actually, Stott is presenting two arguments here. One is that their life experiences forced the disciples into believing in Trinity. The other argument is also strong. The disciples were deep-dyed Jews who had had drilled into them from their birth that God is one. Trinity was the last thing they would have invented in the normal flow of things.

Comparisons Possible

If the world is complicated like our religion is complicated, then maybe, from time to time, we can find in the natural world things that will help us to understand our religion. They will be rough approximations only, but that is better than nothing.

For example, psychology sometimes talks of a person’s mental make-up being ego, id and super-ego. Of course, in a human they often fight each other, but the main point is that if I can be composite, why can’t God?

Here is another comparison from the physical world that might help us understand Trinity. Everyone knows that H2O is water. Oh, but wait a minute. H2O is also steam and ice -- three states of the one substance. So why can’t God have three persons in the one being?

We should not press the comparison too far and decide Spirit is like being surrounded in steam while the Father is as cold as a chunk of ice. All comparisons have their limits. Still, they also have their uses.

Again a thought from Stott’s book might be helpful.

Much of our difficulty in understanding the Trinity arises from confusion about the nature of unity. There are two kinds of unity which have been called "mathematical" and "organic." A mathematical unity is one and indivisible. An organic unity, on the other hand, may contain many component parts. God’s unity is one, but he comprehends the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Two Adams

The usual "orthodox" way of explaining Trinity involves the Adam legend. God is pure holiness and nothing tainted can come into his presence. So when Adam sinned in the Garden of Eden, that meant separation: God expelled him, and sin made him unable to return. It also meant death for, according to this legend’s way of looking at things, the punishment for sin is eventual death as well as weeds in your garden.

At the hinge of history, though, the Son of God stood in for Adam to give perfection another try. This time it was successful. Jesus lived a perfect life; so his death was therefore unjustified. He then took this "credit in the bank" to the Father and said, "Chalk it up not to me but to my team." When added up, the books exactly balanced.

The time line has three parts. The first is shaping history to make ready for Jesus. Second is Jesus’ life itself. Third is Christ (ascended) presenting himself in our humanity to the Father on behalf of humankind. The whole process, the legend says, happens through the participation of the Spirit and at the Father’s prompting. So Trinity is in on everything.

Furthermore, the knowledge of what is going on in heaven is brought to humanity from the Father, through the Son and in the Spirit. This is half the double movement of grace. The other half is us being brought into relation with the Father through the Son and in the Spirit.

Conclusion

Let’s conclude by quoting again the first question asked of people joining the church according to the wording of the traditional service. The question is this:

Do you profess your faith in God your heavenly Father, in Jesus Christ your Saviour and Lord, and in the Holy Spirit your Teacher and Guide? If so, please answer, "I do."

A positive answer places you within the boundaries of the orthodox Christian faith and makes you soul-mate to billions down through the years and now living.

The next challenge is: what will you do with your belief?


Home Faith
Statements
Project
Theology
Theological
Digest & Outlook
Living The
Experience